The fact that we built this bomb does not give us any more... any more right or responsibility to decide how it's used than anyone else. But we're the only people who know about it. I've told Stimson the various opinions of the community. But what's your opinion?
Oppenheimer
21s
TRUMAN (on radio): Sixteen hours ago, an American airplane dropped one bomb on Hiroshima... and destroyed its usefulness to the enemy. (elated laughter outside) The bomb had more power than 20,000 tons of TNT.
Oppenheimer
10s
It is an atomic bomb. - (excited chatter) - (car horns honking) It is a harnessing of the basic powers of the universe.
Oppenheimer
4.6s
Get a message to Kitty. We can't say anything. Tell her to take in the sheets.
Oppenheimer
4.2s
- Get me Potsdam right away. - Yes, sir. (cheering continues)
Oppenheimer
6.7s
(explosion) (rumbling) (silence)
Oppenheimer
1.9s
(silence)
Oppenheimer
2m16s
Mr. Borden, during your investigation into Dr. Oppenheimer, did you reach certain conclusions? - I did. - And did there come a time when you expressed those conclusions in a letter to Mr. J. Edgar Hoover of the Federal Bureau of Investigation? - BORDEN: That is correct. - Prior to the writing of the letter, did you discuss the writing of the letter with anybody attached to the Atomic Energy Commission? I did not. ROBB: Thanks, and do you have a copy of the letter? BORDEN: I have one in front of me. Would you please be so kind as to read it, sir? BORDEN: "Dear Mr. Hoover, the purpose of this letter is to state..." GARRISON: Uh, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, if I could have a... What is the purpose of the delay? He's simply gonna read the letter. (scoffs) Mr. Chairman, this is the first I've seen of this letter, and I see statements here, uh, at least one, of a kind that I don't think anyone would like to see go into the record. These are accusations that have not previously been made. That are not part of the indictment from Nichols. Accusations of a kind that I don't think belong here. The witness wrote this letter on his own initiative, laying out evidence that has already been before the board. His conclusions are valid testimony, just like the... the positive conclusions of friends of Dr. Oppenheimer. It cuts both ways. How long has Counsel been in possession of this letter? I don't think I should be subject to cross-examination by you, Mr. Garrison. GRAY: Mr. Garrison, given that we on the board have all read the letter, wouldn't it be better to have it in the record? Let's proceed. (tense music playing) BORDEN: "Dear Mr. Hoover, "the purpose of this letter is to state my opinion "based upon years of study "of the available classified evidence, "that more probably than not, "J. Robert Oppenheimer is an agent of the Soviet Union. "The following conclusions are justified. "One, between 1929 and 1942, more probably than not, "J. Robert Oppenheimer "was a sufficiently hardened Communist, "that he volunteered information to the Soviets. "Two, more probably than not, "he has since been functioning as an espionage agent. "Three, more probably than not, "he has since acted under a Soviet directive in influencing United States military policy..." I'm sorry, Robert. BORDEN: "atomic energy, intelligence - and diplomatic policy." - Is anyone ever going to tell the truth about what's happening here? CHAIRMAN MAGNUSON: We will now hear from Dr. David Hill. (soft suspenseful music plays)
Oppenheimer
26.1s
They've asked Lawrence. What did he say? He wasn't going to help them, but... But? Strauss told him that you and Ruth Tolman have been having an affair for years. The whole time you lived - with them in Pasadena. - (sighs) He convinced Lawrence that Richard died of a broken heart. That's absurd. - What part? - The broken heart. Richard never found out. Is Lawrence gonna testify? I don't know.
Oppenheimer
1m17s
ROBB: After the Russian A-bomb test, did Dr. Lawrence come to see you about the hydrogen bomb? You'd be better off asking him. Well, I fully intend to. Would you say that Dr. Oppenheimer was unalterably opposed to the H-bomb? No, he-he thought that a fusion program would come at the expense of our awfully good fission program. But that proved not to be the case. In the event both could be done. Suppose that this board did not feel satisfied that in his testimony here, Dr. Oppenheimer had been wholly truthful. What would you say whether or not he should be cleared? Why go through all this against a man who has accomplished what Dr. Oppenheimer has? Look at his record. We have an A-bomb and a whole series of it. We have a whole series of Super bombs. What more do you want? Mermaids? TELLER: But I've known Secretary Strauss for many years, and I feel it a necessity to express the warm support for science and scientists Lewis has shown. We'll break now, unless there's any immediate business. STRAUSS: Senator, I'd like to once again request that we're furnished with a list of witnesses. And I will remind the nominee that we don't always have that information in advance. We do know that Dr. Hill will be here after lunch. Mr. Chairman, our next scheduled witness, Dr. Lawrence, has apparently come down with colitis.
Oppenheimer
32.7s
GARRISON: Dr. Rabi, what governmental positions do you currently hold? I am the chairman of the General Advisory Committee to the AEC, succeeding Dr. Oppenheimer. GARRISON: And how long have you known Dr. Oppenheimer? Since 1928. I... I know him quite well. Well enough to speak to the bearing of his loyalty and character? Dr. Oppenheimer is a man of upstanding character. And he is loyal to the United States, to his friends, to the institutions of which he is part.
Oppenheimer
3.9s
- ROBERT: What was that? - (door closes) RABI: Nothing to worry about.